T. Ramanathan’s Legal Threats
Flop
Posted:
Sunday September 21, 2003
Author: Barry Pittard
Email:
bpittard@beachaccess.com.au
Refs:
http://www.saiaustralia.org.au/release/100.html
(Link doesn't work? We copied that
info for you to exbaba.com!)
ex-baba/engels/letters/barrylaw.html
In a phone call on April 3,
2003, the head of the increasingly cultic Australian Sathya Sai
Organisation, T. Ramanathan, first uttered what several foremost
lawyers have informed me - since he soon published his statements on
the Internet - are defamatory and actionable accusations.
At one point, T. Ramanathan
revealed under my persistent questioning everything and nothing: “You
are going around ringing up everybody.” “You are phoning everybody.”
“You are hurting people.” “You are harassing and intimidating.” Of
course, everybody is a lot of bodies when I have transgressed the
rights of nobody.
Significantly, T. Ramanathan
initiated the contact directly on the heels of my success, which
included media coverage, in getting the University of Adelaide to
cancel their arrangements with his organisation, and to withdraw venue
and catering for the Sai National Conference 2003, despite difficulties
to the University such as having to hand back $30.000. This volté face
for T. Ramanathan could not but have evoked his memories of my
involvement in 2001 in persuading another Vice Chancellor - of the
University of Flinders - to withdraw his university’s high-profile
education delegation to a Human Values conference at Puttaparthi in
September 2001. In fact, its co-sponsor UNESCO (Paris) itself withdrew
from the conference and simultaneously posted a Media Advisory which
dissociated the world body from Sathya Sai Baba and his organisers –
indeed in terms which no half compos mentis target individual or
organisation could but find a stinging rebuke from one of the world’s
most respected bodies:
http://archive.bibalex.org/web/20011031132928/unesco.org/education/highlights/media_advisory.htm.
In our three quarters of an hour
discussion, T. Ramanathan (widely regarded by the more intelligent in
his organisation for being a pompous, autocratic one-man-band) kept dropping
‘spiritual gems’ that really deserve a much wider public. Specifically
anxious that I hear some of his personal experiences of ‘Swami’s glory,’
he related, for example, how en route to India he lost his diary
containing vital and confidential information about his university Law
students, such as their examination marks, but how the lost documents
were miraculously - i.e., physically - materialised in his Bangalore
hotel ‘by Swami’s Divine Mercy.’ Furthermore, how his audio cassette
got irretrievably stuck in his tape recorder and, while T. Ramanathan
slept, ‘Bhagavan’s glory’ extricated it, again by miraculous means, so
that by next morning it lay on the hotel table. Among his own
fraternity, there are plenty of other reliable witnesses he has told
these and other such stories to, and surely the accounts merit the far
wider international audience many of us in the Exposé can provide. What
court of law would not wish, for the sake of divine light relief, to
be regaled with such testimony from a favorite son of the Avatar of
all avatars?
In his follow up letter, April
9, 2003, written on official Australian Sathya Sai Organisation
stationery, T. Ramanathan, reiterating part of what he had told me by
phone, recorded that I had criminally violated the Communications Act
and threatened and harassed devotees and will face the likelihood of a
police procedure and a Class Action lawsuit if I do not stop. Yet T.
Ramanathan but does not do his civic duty and report any such crime to
the police, as a law-abiding citizen will wish that he would. Why does
he not? Clearly, his actions consist in threats and attempted leverage.
They are about power and control. My very dear friend, the late V.K
Narasimhan, the great Indian newspaper editor and editor of Sanathana
Sarathi, once cautioned me to beware of T. Ramanathan saying that he
was a man who hungered after power. How prophetically right this man
famed for much shrewd observation has proved!
This letter T. Ramanathan
promptly published on the official website of his organisation:
http://www.saiaustralia.org.au/release/100.html. (Link doesn't
work? We copied that
info for you to exbaba.com!) See also: ex-baba/engels/letters/barrylaw.html.
No doubt wishing to poison his sword’s tip, he published my then
address (which was temporary and for security reasons kept very
private, but which he cunningly somehow fetched) in his official
notices on the Internet, an act which violates the innate sense of the
right to privacy shared by democratic people everywhere. In the
meantime, the search spiders have picked up his privacy breaching and
defamatory statements for all to see on the World Wide Web. How
spiritual of him!
Both the ostensibly criminal and
the civil matters he mentions would proceed unless I “cease and desist.”
But what is there for me to cease and desist from? His absurd claim
that I have gone about phoning and emailing Sathya Sai devotees in
Australia would collapse perhaps anywhere but in the ‘kangaroo courts’
that he is said to use within the confines of his organisation. For
some sense of such a draconian tendency in T. Ramanathan, see the
report by Stephen Carthew who was one the officials in the Sathya Sai
Organisation most honored for the clarity of his intelligence and
integrity, and who, when he was its South Australian spiritual
coordinator, called for openness and honesty in the organisation’s
response to the worldwide accusations against Sathya Sai Baba for
sexual molestation of boys and young men:
ex-baba/engels/letters/carthew.html.
In a democracy like Australia,
the one-man judge and jury method which T. Ramanathan described to me
in our phone conversation is mind-boggling. (I took careful notes). He
said “I have only one simple mechanism which I have applied down the
years” which is to “deal with complaints personally.” “Your thinking
is cloudy,” he said and stated that there was no need for a complaints
mechanism in the Sathya Sai Organisation, which is “special and
different to any other organisation… and a divine organisation.”
No Sathya Sai Baba devotee known
for her or his integrity will ever be able to sustain T. Ramanathan’s
defamatory untruth. Clearly he uses bullying tactics - to which I am
not at all inclined to fold - and fears his organisational calamities
attendant upon my continuing success in stopping major events of
theirs, with exposure to critical media coverage that a cult would
have everything to fear.
Catching up with T. Ramanathan,
his more thoughtful members might well berate him for threatening
litigation, which Sathya Sai Baba for many years has strongly
inveighed against! If the wiseheads of his organisation do not prevail,
my lawyers would necessarily introduce ‘legal dynamite’ and a sound
and light show fascinating to media and public alike. Many of the
Exposé participants, including hundreds of young males around the
world, or the still emotionally scarred accusers who have grown older,
with their shocking accounts of Sathya Sai’s sexual attentions, would
celebrate such a field day for our cause. Several of the most eminent
legal brains who are at the disposal of the Exposé in Australia and in
other countries have opined to me that, in an attempt to frighten me
off, T. Ramanathan simply threatens like a dockside bully and that the
last thing he would want revealed is what we, most assuredly, will be
more than able to bring on.