Ex Sai student has molested hundreds
of young boys
http://www.quicktopic.com/8/H/qYarJBpGLW7G6
Message
Sanjay
His name is only DIWAKAR and not sai Diwakar, this DIWAKAR is a tall (6 feet 2 inches), originally Srilankan Tamil, guy in his 40's with curly hair who studied at both Whitefield & Parthi campus of SSIHL. He used to do interview room duty along with late E.K. SURESH KUMAR. He is generally given some important assignment by sb, his mother is a tall (6 feet) dark lady doctor who is divorced and works in the SS hospitals. Diwakar is one of the most voracious homosexuals loose at Parthi/Brindavan, you can always spot him moving around with young students holding their hands whom he molests whenever he gets an opportunity. He must have molested HUNDREDS of young boys/men but lives scott free in Whitefield. Incidentally he is married to Late N. RADHAKRISHNAN'S sister who was killed in the early 90's, and lives in the house secretly built by Late Radhakrishnan in Whitefield and works as a medical transcriptionist in a sb devotees company in Bangalore.
Sanjay, if you happen to know any old students who studied in Parthi/Brindavan in the 80's/90's, they can verify the above with perhaps more details.
His contact details:
DIWAKAR MUTTHU KRISHNAN
109, PRASHANTH EXTENSION,
HOPE FARM,WHITEFIELD,
BANGALORE-560066
PH:+91-80-8455032
EMAIL: dinkie@hclinfinet.com
Message
From: http://www.quicktopic.com/8/H/qYarJBpGLW7G6
By: X
To gsmprasad:
There are a number of unclear points in the mail from gsmprasad which I would like to have cleared up, in the interests of accuracy and convincement.
1) "Diwakar is one of the most voracious homosexuals loose at Parthi/Brindavan," What really is a 'voracious homosexual' and how can the writer judge who is 'one of the most voracious' in the entire area of Parthi/Brindavan? Can this a loose statement either be made more convincingly accurate or be substantiated better? If not, it would tend to awaken suspicion about the claim it makes. How can one reckon it must be 'hundreds' and if so, how many ‘hundreds’?
2) Can the writer not just as well name the mother, the ‘tall dark, Indian lady doctor’ at the Sai hospital”? He obviously knows who she is refers to her in a way that makes her almost identifiable? (I think I know to whom he is referring, but am not certain. It would be better if I knew rather than suspect someone else wrongly.
3) Men do tend to hold hands in Pakistan, India and Arabic countries... the wording makes it seem that this itself indicates that male hand-holding is connected with molestation? Can this be restated more accurately and so credibly?
4) Any sexual contact with young boys by an adult is molestation, yes. But Prasad included men (perhaps 'young men' is intended'), but when a male is over the age of consent, this is a homosexual relationship and not a case of molestation (though it could be in some cases). I do not know the legal situation for homosexuals in India, but it seems that sex between consenting adults is attacked here... but this is because the writer is so slipshod in expressing his accusations.
5) "the house secretly built by late Radhakrishnan in Whitefield..." What does this allege... that the house was secretly funded by illegal or embezzled Trust money or the like? (Highly possible, but is this what is being alleged?). One can't keep the construction of a house secret in Brindavan, but the owner's name could be. Can this be made less vague?
Hoping you see my points here. We can't risk the expose for half-explicit allegations. But the material, if it can be substantiated a bit better, preferable supported by other evidence, could have a considerable effect. If not, I fear, the effect could well be just the opposite.
I should think the author's own e-mail address would be a requirement for publishing such pointed allegations. Can it be supplied?
Message
To Mr X!
Here are my Clarifications:
2) Can the writer not just as well name the mother, the ‘tall dark, Indian lady doctor’ at the Sai hospital”? He obviously knows who she is refers to her in a way that makes her almost identifiable?
(I think I know to whom he is referring, but am not certain. It would be better if I knew rather than suspect someone else wrongly.)
*Reply: Diwakar Mutthu Krishnan is the son of the tall female doctor Dr. Kamla of Sri Lankan Origin.
3) Men do tend to hold hands in Pakistan, India and Arabic countries... the wording makes it seem that this itself indicates that male hand-holding is connected with molestation? Can this be restated more accurately and so credibly?4) Any sexual contact with young boys by an adult is molestation, yes.
But Prasad included men (perhaps 'young men' is intended'), But when a male is over the age of consent, this is a homosexual relationship and not a case of molestation (though it could be in some cases). I do not know the legal situation for homosexuals in India, but it seems that sex between consenting adults is attacked here... but this is because the writer is so slipshod in expressing his accusations.
*Reply: Holding hands in Asian Region/Middle East with men is not illegal but Homosexual Acts with males of any age is illegal in the Indian Subcontinent with or without consent as per prevailing laws. You can read men as Young Men and Boys as Boys. Sex without consent is Rape in any country.
1) "Diwakar is one of the most voracious homosexuals loose at Parthi/Brindavan," What really is a 'voracious homosexual' and how can the writer judge who is 'one of the most voracious' in the entire area of Parthi/Brindavan? Can this a loose statement either be made more convincingly accurate or be substantiated better?
If not, it would tend to awaken suspicion about the claim it makes. How can one reckon it must be 'hundreds' and if so, how many ‘hundreds’?
*Reply: Diwakar has had sex with HUNDREDS of unsuspecting young males (from age 10-25 & maybe above too), that is why I have used the word voracious, he always uses his closeness with sb to attract young boys/young men & molests them. He is still continuing to do the same. To get the exact figure why not contact him. He may not be as violent as Anthony Hopkins in Silence of The Lambs! Are numbers so important, are they more important than ruined lives?
5) "the house secretly built by late Radhakrishnan in Whitefield... " What does this allege... that the house was secretly funded by illegal or embezzled Trust money or the like? (Highly possible, but is this what is being alleged?). One can't keep the construction of a house secret in Brindavan, but the owner's name could be. Can this be made less vague?
*Reply: The house built by Radhakrishnan is not in his name, it was not in the knowledge of sb.For everybody's kind information the letter/envelopes sent by devotees to sb many times contain cash,the amount may vary. Larger sums are taken by sb & sent to the trust (When Radhakrishnan was alive this cash was his responsibility to send it to the trust) but smaller sums are generally either given by sb to men doing interview room duty or in many cases just palmed/filched by these gentlemen for keeps sake. Late Radhakrishnan as everybody who knows his family background, was not from a very well off family. The house was built with that sort of money, which may have been substantial. Those who have doubts can verify the same with Mr. Ramcharan, the engineer from West Indies/US, who was a close confidante' of Late Radhakrishnan and also had a major role to play in the construction of the said house. To make it clear the house was made of Illegal money which Late Radhakrishnan siphoned off from the money which was supposed to be given in whole to the trust. He and many others who have been close to sb have generally made millions in a short time.
*Reply: As is clear from the address the house is NOT in Brindavan, which is the walled area, but it is in Hope Farm, Whitefield. Moreover, the address is for all to verify & meet Diwakar in person.
Hoping you see my points here. We can't risk the expose for half-explicit allegations. But the material, if it can be substantiated a bit better, preferable supported by other evidence, could have a considerable effect. If not, I fear, the effect could well be just the opposite.
I should think the author's own e-mail address would be a requirement for publishing such pointed allegations. Can it be supplied?
*Reply: Regarding my e-mail address, why not give me your name first, because I am not sure who all is here & I don't want to be killed by some speeding car or something on a deserted road!
It appears as if a rape victim is being questioned by the defense attorney of the monster who raped. Truth is always bitter. What evidence are you looking for? Semen spots, blood smears, DNA samples, photographs, digital video clips, voice recordings and other cloak & dagger stuff perhaps!Dear Mr. X, those things generally happen in a Bond movie or a thriller involving Sherlock Holmes & the like.
I wish you all the best in your evidence hunting.
From: Ex Baba from Holland (X)
To gsmprasad:
X = Ex Baba, the comments were from Robert Priddy,
Please read the News on www.exbaba.com:
ex-baba/engels/shortnews/exsaimolested.html
And beside this I want to add:
"Robert Priddy writes in direct reply to gemprasad that he understands the threat to personal security to persons criticising Sai Baba, especially those who live in the vicinity under the lawless and wall-to-wall corrupt conditions that prevail there. Your frankness is appreciated. Even in Scandinavia, persons have received death threats from so-called 'Sai devotees' for telling about sex with SB. Thanks to gemprasad for answering as far as possible the comments I had made to the exbaba.com webmaster when they had recirculated your posting on Quick Topic."