/ SIGN THE
2002 / 2003 /
2004 / 2005 /
2006 / 2007 /
2008 / 2009 /
2012 / 2013 /
2014 / 2015 /
/ 2018 /
/ 2020 / 2021 /
My name is mentioned in your Letters in
India Today. I have asked for the text to be removed as it is quoted out
of context. As a proviso for keeping the letter posted your staff agreed
to put an addendum to this quote which says "...is and was never an ex-
devotee...) This should read ( Is a devotee of Sai Baba and was never an
ex-devotee). The harrassment I have suffered as a result of this post
and your obsession with Sai Baba is probably a hundred times worse than
anything that you have alleged Sai Baba has done.
Comment from Exbaba Admin:
http://www.exbaba.com/letters/letters.html you wrote:
India has a long history of Tantric
tradition in yoga which prescribes certain sexual practices under the
guidance of the guru. Perhaps, in surrendering to a guru, sex is the
last boundary of the ego.
Susan Olorenshaw, Bangalore (Is a devotee
of Sai Baba and was never an ex-baba devotee.)
Our comment on this is:
The stupidness of your writing on a site
like this, will 'probably' cause some harrassment from people, who do know
how to think straight, who don't need a faulty guru to follow, you
should learn from them, instead of feeling harrassed.
Is it a fact that Robert.C.Priddys
so callled 'wife ' is actually his servant maid? If so then why does he
not declare her so? Does he pay her fair wages for services rendered to
him? Is it also a fact that his so called 'son' is actually his old
lover who is now blackmailing him? Is it a fact that Priddy is a drug
addict with AIDS?
Comment from Exbaba Admin:
No, nothing of this is a fact, but it
surely is a fact, that a lo life clown from Bangalore, India, as above, is harassing himself
by ridicilous statements, of which he or she knows, that none of this
could have the slightest sparkle of truth in it.
You might find my papers interesting:
defamatory documentary, The Secret Swami, made in 2004 on Sathya Sai
Baba, and then subsequently withdrawn from Channel 4 due to criminal
lawsuits is however all over the Internet.
simple minded devotees like Robert Priddy for example, believed every
word that the BBC said in this piece of defamation. Yet what is the
credibility and integrity of the BBC worth? Recent revelations on the
BBCs cover up of the sexual abuse of underage children, both boys and
girls, by two top BBC presenters, Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall, spread
over several decades horrified the world and has raised serious doubts
about the BBCs impartiality and objectivity.
to suffer from grave moral double standards and racial arrogance when
reporting alleged misdemeanours by non-whites and whites especially by
white Protestant Englishmen. A retired judge, Dame Janet Smith conducted
the probe into allegations against Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall and
concluded that the BBC, for decades hushed up matters due to a culture
of "reverence and fear" in the BBC towards its celebrity presenters. The
probe found that Jimmy Savile had raped 72 boys and girls of which 34
were under the age of 16. What is even more shameful is that these rapes
were carried out on the BBCs office premesis.
Hall, a lesser achiever, raped 13 girls and is now in jail. The BBCs
Director-General, Tony Hall made a public apology on BBC World
Television on 25th february 2016 to the victims of BBCs lust and
admitted that the BBC had failed them. Get raped and then make do with
an apology? Not likely! The victims are planning to engage the best
lawyers in the world and sue the BBC and the British government for
damages which will amount to billions of pounds.
likely to succeed, as the probe has already been done and everything
proved by a judge beyond a shadow of doubt. Consider this, such an
organisation which regularly condoned rape of minors on its very own
office premesis for decades, now has the gumption to make slanderous
charges on asian Hindu relegious leaders? Why doesn't the BBC have the
gumption to make such documentaries on the sex life of Al-Bagdadi the
revered leader of ISIS? Is it because the BBC journalists are terrified
of having their throats slit with a kitchen knife by Britains own Muslim
doesnt the BBC make defamatory documentaries on the hundreds of
Cardinals and Bishops world wide who have pending criminal proceedings
for rape of underage boys spread over several decades? Why pick only on
Hindu Gurus and Godmen? This is because of the racial arrogance of the
British Raj. The BBC and the British have yet to get over their racist
superiority complex, when it comes to dealing with or reporting on
non-white peoples or cultures.
explains the ease with which rabidly racist Englismen like Robert Priddy.
lap up any drivel that the BBC dishes out without once questioning its
veracity. Priddy confesses that the BBCs defamatory documentary on Sai
Baba in 2004 made him see the "light".
fool Priddy is! For 20 years, according to Priddys own confessions, he
told lies about Baba and then he saw the BBCs" light" on a TV screen and
then, for the next 15 years began maligning Baba! This doesnt speak much
for Priddys maturity, even at the ripe old age of 88, nor for his
devotion or faith in god! It only illustrates what a ludicruous
Englishman he really is!